- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
& k0 n) G1 G+ O9 s$ V4 E* DBoy Induced by Indirect Topical/ a& b! A( C3 y) s7 W
Exposure to Testosterone
5 x6 D' Q4 b' ^Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2: e0 z) Q* w7 x u9 ]6 ~8 ~) A( q
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
5 Y& |! K1 B$ B6 G- E1 \Clinical Pediatrics
. H3 p+ k/ _6 G7 CVolume 46 Number 6
' Z/ h6 Q; ] S' e& MJuly 2007 540-543
% Q9 N: l9 O1 U* P+ u: ^© 2007 Sage Publications3 m- ~% f8 \- r( ^5 E7 b
10.1177/00099228062966510 ^% F+ m8 H- `# [ B4 X
http://clp.sagepub.com8 D2 c- ^% R3 |* g* y x$ @. z
hosted at
: b6 c) B W6 R# Z p$ Whttp://online.sagepub.com9 Z0 V ?- `% y" Y
Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
$ O( x# B: g8 H2 Y7 K. d+ \1 h0 {is a significant concern for physicians. Central. U! }' Z1 i) ^2 c; |
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated4 V8 F5 p f( E
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has) s9 k3 q- j! M4 U: _0 F1 e
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
9 w: ^: N0 p2 Rlesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested" L( X% L" W7 A% I, H, f
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic% [' _' j ~- a, ?$ E1 M4 b
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
7 K! Z' k* b) y' @( D) gcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
/ ?8 W% q9 k* |' T( Rreport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
% X) {8 m( O1 t( X; eenlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-1 z) P; ?, j( a3 m
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due- I% f6 T* N/ h
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by4 y/ G/ w! F* V4 u. B
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-% m* u$ _- C/ e$ V* y' J
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this" u) P4 j$ m( j) _
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of( T1 F# s$ I {* C4 b
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-* e% f/ f0 Z# l5 M7 A
bly more common than the rare case report in the. W* b2 S' F. d5 A7 O
literature.4* D) p5 d/ e; r6 @" ]! K
Patient Report
. z" ~4 B3 S1 ?; x+ N2 yA 16-month-old white child was referred to the0 c h: q2 {; ?( D, g7 M& o
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern9 P" `6 n7 B; b0 I
of early sexual development. His mother noticed7 M* J5 N. c: g$ P
light colored pubic hair development when he was
3 L8 K1 o1 V- fFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of1 F5 S! C0 {$ C. b# V- ~- m$ X
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.4 R5 q/ c$ g. z8 N: W j. F! ~
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,) B" O: |: W' V& _4 B! R1 T6 Z
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of- d6 _/ e! y7 d1 z9 k
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
" J# I! ~! r) \7 e6 |4 Qe-mail: [email protected].
( K7 b2 I6 @4 {) h0 v6 `/ \about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became$ o. v( m$ b J0 p& `( V
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
5 e$ H2 i \6 J3 b- ?- f4 n# _ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child1 I* A& O6 v; E- X
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with3 Z8 s2 L: i7 e. v' b) e" ~
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of1 V" m2 J( h9 ~
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year' ^+ m) t& ~ }0 t# U3 o: I
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with
; K* d% \' N. Zsolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
$ w8 F+ w. {+ p+ _8 m) b8 \& {and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
; g6 {; w. Z0 f" c; F8 U z' s" @$ xwas age appropriate.' m4 N+ [; U, q$ r
The family history was remarkable for the father,
2 z5 R S0 P) y( L) @# T7 W; `who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
, c- m& c2 b8 v0 J, C5 lwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
' ?& O$ x9 A! r8 Q6 N8 ~height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
" J. h/ j1 d6 Z5 n% V$ Wearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.7 w) l- p" V+ C1 c r) [& ^; c9 n
The father denied taking any other medication. The
" U: j" R- n( d/ w* X" T! H& a: b9 lchild’s mother was in good health. Her menarche7 ?7 a+ ^. T1 w7 {0 m
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet& A, H& ?$ n& _) f
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
; E8 C0 D. S8 o& H0 @cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-) ~* t* w4 h3 z3 b9 ~% N2 k
tives. There were no siblings.
. u7 q4 ^6 G* a% p( O7 u. OPhysical Examination& K5 b( D5 P" R' ]* y P5 m. U
The physical examination revealed a very active,
6 z6 _ T' V; }+ E- Dplayful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented5 t# i9 r( u0 v; |2 h, P
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
# J. F, @ f7 C0 [3 t* c# w90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
0 O: z$ p% r# d) K6 v2 E q(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
) a* ]+ _! C2 pvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
. ?& Q7 p/ q& g9 P& Y* `the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.. J; H9 c. @3 @; p) h- U
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
' }7 N1 Z- X* e3 Xenlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
2 i4 Q- x) p5 b4 v3 z. f. |8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well$ @5 P' t$ _7 Z% P4 m
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
! F* c' u8 Z; ^ i6 O6 m540! x2 v0 ~. T1 A" M- f" p* p
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from z9 e+ C+ u L+ F5 y
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The2 ^- f5 D* O+ f8 M
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each., S3 V3 W, [9 z* D4 d' C& W1 |, b
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat" d1 g3 b. {' u
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
# J; `0 F3 {) p, `9 Aabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
% u: v) j# Y, K$ S# mNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+3 i) X5 o6 k% C: W D
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion% G- d8 D) f7 ?' z
of papilledema.
' y5 ~) t, D1 I$ |Laboratory Evaluation6 C7 M5 f) y- h- X$ e& N
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by, Y- p/ S. k- |/ K. \/ I' y' b, g+ P
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
, }/ m) ^5 B+ f5 J/ {2 ^3 Glogic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal ]$ ~' U& n. Z1 \" O- Y4 K3 F
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test' s! `: Z3 D( j9 _" A2 {% ]( {+ X
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-/ R' r7 h2 i. I
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).6 I- K& w8 o+ z, W& b
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood) m: T8 h8 ]2 V) j: J& r. r3 G8 y1 _
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were6 M( W4 |: s0 ~& I7 X
within normal range for his age. The concentration
- j" n6 S' N1 X' ~1 X+ u1 xof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
3 F3 v; d# ^* L4 T/ Y(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
; d5 r8 b& i3 N0 C; `8 M+ T' X. Bng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-" m% e5 ?' M: G( e- u6 b
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
$ Y- [5 m: R9 i# {. idesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to% ^8 _9 Z( [. b; v* [1 D
49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)% V: K8 K. ?& d
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
2 \! |( A% x; x3 i2 Y2 J) S3 r* I! Rtisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
3 o4 A m9 ~- I: w, \' [testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
) V1 a3 f+ X" Y: Rand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
& l2 o3 [. M0 N5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
( `) Z6 g1 q4 T4 i( lstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone! D1 g& S. C* |
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
" c4 m" B- Q4 h$ }! C: A( }(prepubertal).
: k! l& G8 Q+ Q" l8 UThe parents were notified about the laboratory8 m9 @# \: b7 F. _- m7 L; I
results and were informed that all of the tests were4 C+ P# j! V% P! t. u
normal except the testosterone level was high. The% o/ l8 I v P8 ~* H$ t
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to( s% ~- i+ a% Q" l1 H' k! `5 R: V2 F
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
1 h( S! ~6 ~* R" n/ t, `ever, the family did not return for 4 months.1 l' ~9 |" M# p, e$ w( g: v/ }
Physical examination at this time revealed that the
3 n( D: D# A. v- u7 D" G+ Qchild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained0 J) H4 v6 }. F4 k8 @& E, S
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
# H/ r0 }7 o) s: w8 L' m0 ^unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-" A- g+ W( h# e \+ k
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
. Q8 |+ w4 R! t( g& B6 v: Rthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
3 E, J8 S& ~# D3 S5 ]) QmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.: v- n, l% v4 M3 P+ {" ?# a1 j
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-6 O$ `0 ?! t7 A1 c5 F) Y
ing frequent erections.1 n, g0 h! i" U E: W
Both parents were again questioned about use of; e1 c5 ]% g+ P( u
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to8 H7 W9 f* x3 p+ `6 Y
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
" {4 _# o3 k a+ J) d6 kTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 5416 O+ ]1 x, W; m' N9 a9 c$ s
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-! _. z4 m: h0 }% R/ i
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
- q3 \; N& H4 z7 @a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed7 N( E1 m3 l0 O( m4 X9 }
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
, ~1 X1 J9 p4 A, R! I" wscribed by his family physician for decreased libido5 T7 B3 h1 l# Q2 t
secondary to depression./ p* f' y) m0 Y; i1 L) J
The child slept in the same bed with parents.. W; Y. X9 Q+ J0 z& [
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his
3 }3 e9 n7 }5 x0 Uchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
; C+ G& ?$ ~) H7 n5 T+ qnificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
( J1 H) `3 _2 b# LThe father also admitted that after the phone call,# w0 R6 B) S9 p
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby
1 s& Z8 c6 N( Kwas high, he then read the product information7 N5 `* j# D! t
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
% y' Y, s; m7 v7 D3 s- Vson for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
2 @$ l6 K/ y! u0 Adecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
$ f/ s+ b7 p) @9 ufather was not hugging him with bare skin and had3 G# ?" y4 _" J; Y8 ?
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
& d6 K' `- l7 u0 I( j2 B7 Jtest was ordered, but the family did not go to the
6 \3 j" K% p! e+ o) Y) p% X/ w# w) _- `laboratory to obtain the test., J+ e9 D2 b/ P9 s, `- r
Discussion7 Z: L! p9 L! U( D! a* C; N- x) v
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
9 @) ~) G7 I2 [3 S _" ]sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
: `! T2 D7 O1 `4 r/ Z* e( JPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when( U7 U/ g" c3 }4 n+ j' t
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
$ p4 X+ x4 J( Q* R* I- R$ {thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
9 z' Z m) g# Q' X- ~0 o. J% umon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP v& P5 v8 y: P
may have a central nervous system lesion that is
+ F% F7 B2 A2 K! p' O6 \3 x& D1 Sresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
+ ?7 O' y/ R h5 ^& o( _% camic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
' o) B( |0 P* ^- O7 hsis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
* l \1 p. ^6 R7 B. x7 ^; f! \boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-- E5 g( \2 h# l& v; y* L
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
2 I; c' [9 K g0 Zrical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
: e' U. Q8 v6 t( F2 O0 e; Jgonadotropins.1,37 d; V2 `) p _- `% { ]
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-* b+ n4 n: @6 ]+ C
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
9 Q; A, D. O. M; l) ]/ k. @androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or! H+ ?8 q" a9 t- y- O
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
2 G) `: u$ \! h: z9 sulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing% u$ k; R! x$ w6 U
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
5 M) {; b/ ^. B3 Y! K3 b: gadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
) J9 o5 M4 O' e; A8 @( M/ ypuberty in boys.3,4! I$ G* K5 {4 P4 `8 @8 Z. R: {
The most common form of congenital adrenal
_, K* K) @5 _! C0 hhyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.; O5 t a- G5 Y: ?
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in, D. Y+ @5 S( @
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,9 e( A5 G, Y7 e) o4 G
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen5 e, v- G% z. I
excess.1,3
- E' B8 z/ S- t& |at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
5 |4 w# o1 ]! V3 r3 L542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 20070 e* s: ^+ b3 A+ j4 a
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-) C5 W' t3 l& w0 t G
independent precocious puberty, which is also known- r h1 J+ `) P
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
0 v7 t: B# O% e$ _3 M5 u+ Tvery young age. The physical findings in these boys% I A: Y! g5 B" P
with this disorder are full pubertal development,
' C0 D9 B* ]- t6 ^3 yincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys9 Y1 \3 w1 D! a4 U6 E2 e% A
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder- w( y7 z( f0 J& r
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show9 a$ _) R, T* s4 k4 Z; u
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
* R* [2 G! J9 e" Wreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
6 \* i3 F, k" Y+ m* Rautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
- J, h$ x4 ^ {" c6 Z4 _males; therefore, other male members of the family- ?' X# }( ?1 U/ T
may have similar precocious puberty.3& t. L7 _5 N3 R v1 O2 ]8 W
In our patient, physical examination was incon-
/ \- \' t2 K. O9 r6 h. nsistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-/ u9 D- V# b; K5 {. Y. e
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis% W! b4 Q! l6 c* Q
was in the differential diagnosis because his father% I# W* |2 L* t, [, d0 E
started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
7 @$ Q( J' d. m4 v# ttesticular enlargement is not that evident in the
8 l4 K4 O0 w4 w! x5 F" q2 ?. ^beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-4 l W! k, x7 e' k8 s a* b
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
* F) h% w* M3 G3 |; b1 Fbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
+ {" C5 b8 f* {7 W. j4 Deither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase& s# ^! M& X% e& ~
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
( c# F" ~9 H1 {: T1 @2 Z; Ning the normal level of adrenal steroids.
5 }( a% R% k: A* G% u2 LThe diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
. N- u7 ?$ R6 v- \& n7 r" Msuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
- V% {7 X, }( ]2 G/ P, ^& {the physical examination revealed the complete disap-2 O7 F" I2 e" }- m" ]7 E7 J% `
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
% T2 A m/ }& Ddecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-' ^% F: u! M9 I6 N6 S X N
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
9 q7 H2 I. c$ b( c; Y) H9 rusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’: i2 E6 N8 g" u8 a+ N0 X- o
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or' q0 U f: I- N' P7 C- R- o) T
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to! `' \( d+ O9 V {
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.$ p' f3 `" @; _3 `4 P k* q
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the7 Z1 Q' e' h9 X6 _3 K- Z
baseline value in those females who were exposed to4 }4 D) s6 P9 _6 z& o; b
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male i( c& j, A# [/ P# n* Q
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-" D8 S1 y, n, x) K7 ]: C, }
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented. I5 v( O4 j# ?
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL," W* ?' o4 Y. q6 W7 {
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
* I* ~8 G. M$ Z" X6 I. Rdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
& Z# h# ?) K4 j/ _! j6 M1 w& A' l8 d! ?# Qterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more: H4 S2 L2 D" W ^. W6 ]' | p/ _
active in young children exposed to testosterone
* p* J9 c! H# F5 ~4 k Fexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-: m% S+ i; O7 {1 f* H4 d' Z8 S
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
8 m" Z0 {9 W! P( }/ V, U* j9 C" yvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
1 Z* M* A k% E% w2 ]4 \+ }" U5 Echildren results in an increase in growth velocity and
& L# ]" l6 B% \2 F4 L) uadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.7 T7 s3 h- ? `$ [5 z0 v/ O
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during
' j1 u0 E5 W. f. s& U- M# Learly childhood on pubertal development and final
4 x2 n8 N% ?" z: Yadult height are not fully known and always remain9 @1 Y5 d$ V! }- w" t5 _+ {/ l! O
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
* Z2 B D ^( N) M( iterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
! I9 g$ ]0 F2 y+ K& J# h- g3 qacceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
4 N2 o. g4 | M4 dcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation4 H/ g5 R5 j& {
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9& g5 n+ ]& ^4 z) |
There are conflicting reports and controversy
, q7 B, W+ l) o) ^. Sover the effect of early androgen exposure on adult7 d7 o$ W0 e5 b$ }9 ~6 T
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal1 {4 ?' A8 P' f
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-! v+ x6 @; c6 _0 D8 j) ?* t
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
- B) p0 ]3 Z$ w( R; wSutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
" J3 U% J, m! q2 k7 S Q9 Rchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult6 E7 r9 P' l n5 N) @; W2 p, o% |
penile length in clinical studies.$ k _# [2 {. k, c
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
4 {7 ~7 [% A4 B V/ O* W* S- Rgoing to experience any of the untoward effects from! ^$ R6 h- J0 R7 m6 \3 ]! x
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
/ L9 l8 V1 X- \4 c# v: I6 m' n/ V* mthe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
% C4 C9 a# @, ]0 ]/ S/ [) zAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of/ L' z, e9 b# O& ~ a! F4 a4 D
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at% R) U: i4 n3 a$ A+ C
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
( P/ O$ C" L5 ~. ^" Wheight will not be affected.
3 \; [: r) f9 x! h" H5 t+ wAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-+ y- [3 _$ s, `0 F% C y- m$ c
ability of androgen products in our society may
% J: k3 X6 p( J8 K& s. c0 Nindeed cause more virilization in male or female
3 G& B+ Z0 m" \children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-: g# J" `' i; }
gen products must be considered and specific ques-
- N% ~/ k9 x3 btioning about the use of a testosterone product or
. g" }4 d! j; D+ D( T, dgel should be asked of the family members during
% W% ~. u9 H) L2 J1 cthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-
" \: o" {8 S5 k: }7 c, |: W0 Filization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
3 e' B! |8 O# Z9 Vnosis can be established by just a few tests and by" P0 {( q& O, F
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a k; u* }$ l6 Y5 g, {. x
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may! d+ ]+ j4 ^- a$ |/ E
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive' C1 o: V4 P& q7 o
investigation. The primary care physician should be0 w' z* H! c7 {' S9 ^
aware of this fact, because most of these children7 L3 K9 w; l8 \. N9 k1 r* w; d; ]2 Y
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
8 \6 o+ G, l* p& d$ wDesk Reference and package insert should also put a' I1 o8 n* Z: o9 I/ q7 D7 z" Z) h' y
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or' y& J- {5 O. @4 \: J8 o# W
female child who might come in contact with some-
* O5 L1 W1 c8 j% t' a# w8 Vone using any of these products.
" _1 `9 x* P4 VReferences
7 S7 F- [; Z* E% u* e0 p9 n+ O5 H5 K1 H1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
' k" H6 f; c+ l j& J8 X/ Hand puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
( S2 Y9 P Z6 i3 t* Y( Y) mEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
7 e* K4 e5 ^+ l9 i+ g2002: 565-628.
7 d9 _% ^7 w8 I0 M0 U8 m0 b- w2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
6 _: T! h8 [: x' \, V' T' Mpuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|